Publikationen
Wissenschaftliche Aktivität ist der Schlüssel zu Innovation und Fortschritt. Wir beschäftigen uns nicht nur klinisch sondern auch wissenschaftlich mit entscheidenden Fragestellungen rund um das Pankreaskarzinom. Auf diesen Seiten finden Sie eine Auswahl von entscheidenden Artikeln, die das Zentrum in den letzten Jahren veröffentlicht hat.
Publikationen aus dem Jahr 2009
The Inflammatory Pancreatic Head Mass Significant Differences in the Anatomic Pathology of German and American Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis Determine Very Different Surgical Strategies
Background: The indications for surgery and the surgical strategy selectedfor chronic pancreatitis (CP) vary widely, perhaps because of unaccounted characteristics of different patient populations such as the “inflammatory mass” in the head of the pancreas, commonly described in Europe but not in America. (…)
Conclusions: Symptoms, duration of conservative therapy, and selection of surgical treatment all
differed significantly between German and American patients with CP. These differences
seem to be dependent upon surprising but unexplained disparities in the pathologic pancreatic
anatomy between the populations.
Reduced postoperative pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy
Introduction: Metaanalysis of retrospective studies employing various definitions of pancreatic fistulas demonstrated a reduced postoperative pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy. Prospective trials failed to do so, which causes an ongoing debate on the superiority of one or the other procedure. The aim of this study was to compare the two types of anastomosis at our institution with regard to postoperative pancreatic fistula and other complications. RESULTS: With pancreatogastrostomy, there were significantly less postoperative pancreatic fistulae grade B and C (pancreatogastrostomy (PG) versus pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ), 11.4% versus 22.6%, p = 0.03), more intraluminal hemorrhage (PG versus PJ, 10.5% versus 0%, p < 0.001) and more delayed gastric emptying grade B and C (PG versus PJ, 18.3% versus 7.9%, p = 0.03). Operative time was shorter (PG versus PJ, median 420 versus 450 min, p < 0.01), and intensive care unit stay was longer (PG versus PJ, median 4 days versus 5 days, p < 0.01), with a tendency toward reduced overall hospital stay (PG versus PJ, median 17 versus 19 days, p = 0.08).
Conclusion: Surgeons should be aware of a higher rate of delayed gastric emptying and perform meticulous hemostasis to prevent intraluminal bleeding with pancreatogastrostomy. Pancreatogastrostomy is superior to pancreaticojejunostomy in terms of relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula.
The lymph node ratio is the strongest prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancer
Introduction: Survival after surgery of pancreatic cancer is still poor, even after curative resection. Some prognostic factors like the status of the resection margin, lymph node (LN) status, or tumor grading have been identified. However, only few data have been published regarding the prognostic influence of the LN ratio (number of LN involved to number of examined LN). We, therefore, evaluated potential prognostic factors in 182 patients after resection of pancreatic cancer including assessment of LN ratio. RESULTS: … The conventional nodal status or the number of examined nodes (in all patients and in the subgroups of node positive or negative patients) had no significant influence on survival. Patients with one metastatic LN had the same outcome as patients with negative nodes, but prognosis decreased significantly in patients with two or more LN involved.
Conclusions: Not the lymph node involvement per se but especially the LN ratio is an independent prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancers. In our series, the LN ratio was even the strongest predictor of survival. The routine estimation of the LN ratio may be helpful not only for the individual prediction of prognosis but also for the indication of adjuvant therapy and herein related outcome and therapy studies.
The EMT-activator ZEB1 promotes tumorigenicity by repressing stemness-inhibiting microRNAs
Abstract: Invasion and metastasis of carcinomas is promoted by the activation of the embryonic 'epithelial to mesenchymal transition' (EMT) program, which triggers cellular mobility and subsequent dissemination of tumour cells. We recently showed that the EMT-activator ZEB1 (zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1) is a crucial promoter of metastasis and demonstrated that ZEB1 inhibits expression of the microRNA-200 (miR-200) family, whose members are strong inducers of epithelial differentiation. Here, we report that ZEB1 not only promotes tumour cell dissemination, but is also necessary for the tumour-initiating capacity of pancreatic and colorectal cancer cells. We show that ZEB1 represses expression of stemness-inhibiting miR-203 and that candidate targets of miR-200 family members are also stem cell factors, such as Sox2 and Klf4. Moreover, miR- 200c, miR-203 and miR-183 cooperate to suppress expression of stem cell factors in cancer cells and mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells, as demonstrated for the polycomb repressor Bmi1. We propose that ZEB1 links EMT-activation and stemness-maintenance by suppressing stemness-inhibiting microRNAs (miRNAs) and thereby is a promoter of mobile, migrating cancer stem cells. Thus, targeting the ZEB1-miR-200 feedback loop might form the basis of a promising treatment for fatal tumours, such as pancreatic cancer.
Wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichungen

An dieser Stelle möchten wir Sie einladen sich einen Überblick über unsere wissenschaftliche Forschung zu verschaffen. Hierzu stellen wir Ihnen entscheidende Artikel des jeweiligen Jahres zur Verfügung.
